Gender recognition process urgently needs reform say MPs

There is a new report published on 21st December 2021 on desirable reforms to the Gender Recognition Act.

Despite taking two years to do so, the Government has failed to adequately respond to its own consultation on reforming the Gender Recognition Act (GRA) 2004, leaving a gender recognition process which is unfair and overly medicalised. In its new Report, Reform of the Gender Recognition Act, the cross-party Women and Equalities Committee describe the Government's response to the 2018 consultation as 'minimal', and calls for urgent reforms to be made to the Act.  

Drawing on evidence from both trans rights and women's rights groups, representing voices for and against reform, the Report considers the Government's proposed amendments to the 17-year-old Act. Calling on Government Ministers to 'properly engage' with the Committee's scrutiny, the Report makes a number of recommendations for meaningfully reforming the legislation, including the de-medicalisation of the gender recognition process, the removal of the spousal consent provision and the requirement to live in the acquired gender.  

  The Report also considers the interplay between the GRA and the 2010 Equality Act, calling for consistency across the two and for greater clarity to be provided on exceptions, enabling employers, service providers and sports bodies to operate with confidence within the law.  

  The Committee calls on the Government to: 

·       Remove the requirement of a 'gender dysphoria' diagnosis from the process of obtaining a Gender Recognition Certificate, thus de-medicalising transition, as was supported by former Prime Minister Theresa May when commissioning the consultation. Instead, the focus must be shifted to a system of self-declaration. 

·       Remove the requirement for trans people to have lived in their acquired gender for two years- which, says the Report, 'risks entrenching outdated and unacceptable gender stereotypes', as well as the need for spousal consent. Instead, the Committee recommend, the body issuing the certificate must be given the power to issue annulments at the same time.    

·       Conduct a review on the- currently opaque- Gender Recognition Panel which approves applications for Gender Recognition Certificates, considering whether it would be appropriate to replace with the Registrar General for England and Wales. In the meantime, steps must be taken to make the operation and role of the panel more transparent.  

·       Urgently publish new guidance, incorporating worked examples and case studies, which would clarify where single-sex and separate-sex exceptions can be applied to the 2010 Equality Act. This is particularly relevant where, for example, women's refuges and other service providers are left unclear as to whether the exclusion of trans people from certain spaces is in violation of the law.    

·       Develop a specific healthcare strategy for transgender and non-binary people, including training for GPs around treating trans and non-binary patients and improved access to support services. 

·       Commit to continuing to implement the LGBT Action Plan. The Committee expressed concerns that the plan seems to have been abandoned by the current Women and Equalities Minister, and seek clarity as to if, and why, this is the case.   

Chair of the Women and Equalities Committee, Rt Hon Caroline Nokes MP, said:   

"The Government took nearly two years to respond to the consultation on an Act that was written at the turn of the millennium. The GRA is crying out for modernisation, and the Government has spectacularly missed its opportunity. This is an area of reform which has attracted strong opinions and debate, but there are areas- such as the removal a time period for living in an acquired gender- which many can agree on. The Government's failure to implement even these changes- made clear in its consultation- suggest its lack of willingness to engage.   

"Being trans is not an illness. It is imperative that the Government de-medicalise the process of gender recognition by removing the outdated requirement for a gender dysphoria diagnosis. The current response to the 2018 consultation has amounted to little more than administrative changes. We are now calling on the Government to enact real, meaningful change." 

You can read the report here: Women & Equalities Report December 2021

 

 

Comments

    1. Jane Hamlin Post author

      Hi Dorothy, I don’t agree. Trans men are covered as much as trans women. Unfortunately, as always so far, those who identify as non-binary are neglected – other than a demand that the Government “Develop a specific healthcare strategy or transgender and non-binary people, including training for GPs around treating trans and non-binary patients and improved access to support services.” I like the dig at Liz Truss in the recommendation that the Government “Commit to continuing to implement the LGBT Action Plan. The committee expressed concerns that the plan seems to have been abandoned by the current Women & Equalities Minister.” As she is now the Brexit supremo (appointed to that role after this report was completed, but before it was published) along with Foreign Secretary and Women and Equalities Minister, I fear the report will get buried in a cupboard somewhere.
      Jane

  1. Eleanor Roberts

    I think the statement clearly demonstrates the schism that exists about this issue between parliament and the current government. After all, this is Caroline Nokes writing, the current chair of the Commons Select Committee and a backbench Tory MP. As in so many things the government clearly prefers sitting on its hands and doing next to mothing, something that seems to be its policy in so many areas. Policy is in fact controlled by a few dozen extreme right-winger backbenchers (plus Jacob Rees-Mogg) who still seem to be obsessed by “good, old-fashioned family values”, and the government is scared to upset them.
    Maybe members should take the opportunity to submit views during the extended consultation period. Trans people are not a threat to women (or anyone else) and the process needs to be significantly simplified, made transparent and de-medicalised, exactly as Ms Nokes suggests.

  2. Isla Sheppard

    Saw something online a day or two back about UK government suggesting that Scotland should stop its process amendment, so iIthink the chance of anything useful happening in England is somewhere between very slim and zero

  3. Isla Sheppard

    Saw something online a day or two back about UK government suggesting that Scotland should stop its process amendment, so I think the chance of anything useful happening in England is somewhere between very slim and zero